Posts Tagged ‘Wind Turbine’

 

About wind turbines: Where do I mount one?

By Networx.comFri, Sep 17 2010 at 11:27 AM ES

Efficiency, safety and neighbors are key issues for wind power siting.

About wind turbines: A roof installation is not recommended.

NOT RECOMMENDED: A roof-mounted residential turbine. (Photo: tswind/Flickr)

So you studied the maps and collected local wind data. You know wind power is cost-effective in your area. Now it’s time to site the turbine. Here is how to maximize efficiency and safety while being a good neighbor.

Get Above the Trees
The American Wind Energy Association recommends placing the bottom edge of the rotor blade at least 30 feet above any trees or buildings within a 500-foot radius. Such barriers slow wind speed and create turbulence, which causes undue wear on a turbine and reduces efficiency. Also, be sure to measure 30 feet from the expected full-growth height of any trees, not the current height.
Stay off the Roof
Putting a turbine on top of the house might seem like an easy way to add a few feet, but experts advise against roof-mounted wind turbines. Some companies refuse to install roof-mounted turbines. They are typically noisy, unsafe and ineffective. Roofs are not built to withstand the weight of wind turbines, and vibrations from the turbine may be felt in the house. The roof also creates too much turbulence to allow the turbine to operate efficiently.
Mount a Safe Tower
Don’t buy a top-shelf wind turbine and skimp on the tower. A poorly built or sited tower may pose safety hazards. Home wind turbines are typically placed on guyed-lattice towers, which look like radio broadcast towers. Steel cables help support a three-sided frame of metal strips. Guyed-lattice towers are the least expensive option, and they are relatively easy to install without building a thick foundation. However, guy wires extend in a radius of up to 75 percent of the tower height, so they require a relatively large space. Also consider a hinge at the bottom of the tower to lower the turbine for maintenance or during hurricanes and other hazardous weather.
Choose the Right Materials
Take care when choosing materials for the turbine and tower. Aluminum towers may be cheap, but they are liable to crack. Also, some metal rotor blades interfere with television and radio signals. Fiberglass is a better option.
Be a Good Neighbor
Minimize the aesthetic and sonic impacts of a wind turbine. Look for the Swift Wind Turbine and other models with quieter designs. Also consider compromising efficiency to keep from upsetting neighbors. Electric output increases exponentially with both wind speed and blade size. A tall tower with large rotor blades will generate more power, but will generate more complaints about blocking views or creating an eyesore.
Check local restrictions before mounting a wind turbine. Many cities require a zoning permit for home wind turbines, and they may impose height restrictions. Homeowners’ associations may also forbid wind turbines.
A Breezy Alternative
Finally, if a wind turbine won’t work on your property, you can still indirectly harness wind energy by purchasing wind power credits. At least 750 electric utilities charge an optional “green pricing” premium to offset the costs of building new wind farms and other renewable energy systems. The U.S. Department of Energy lists green pricing programs.
A wind turbine can reduce both power bills and your carbon footprint, but only if the turbine tower is properly sited. Wind speeds aren’t enough. Space, surrounding wind barriers and zoning restrictions must also be considered.
 
 
 

Rules for Wind Power

A request by a tree farmer to install a 120-foot-tall wind turbine on his Long Lane, East Hampton, property has demonstrated that the Town of East Hampton is in need of guidelines for where and how such things are placed. Stephen Mahoney is seeking state and town permits to have the electricity-generating turbine installed on his 20-acre parcel. But the plan has drawn opposition from neighbors and others who want to preserve their views or are concerned about health and safety risks.

The specific location of Mr. Mahoney’s proposed wind turbine has been criticized because it is among many acres that were preserved with taxpayer money and that have been officially designated as scenic. At 120 feet tall, the turbine would tower over all that it is near. Mr. Mahoney should be allowed his turbine, but he should be asked to compromise on a height more acceptable to those who enjoy the view as it is.

The town, however, has no specific regulations governing such projects, though there have been calls for them over the years. This leaves the town board in the unusual position of becoming involved in a land-use decision, something otherwise reserved for other, less political boards, such as planning and zoning. Rules for wind power should be adopted before any additional projects are reviewed.

 
 
 

Fully enclosed wind turbine should quiet the NIMBY crowd

Wind power has long been a favorite of the tree hugging environmentalists, but as with most great ideas, you’ll also find a NIMBY (not in my back yard) crowd complaining about everything from bird strikes to the swishing noise created by the rotating blades. Personally, I think wind farms are really cool, and they show that we’re actually doing something about energy besides chanting drill baby drill.

The Fuller Wind Turbine from Solar Aero Research addresses most of the anti-wind crowd’s concerns. With a fully enclosed turbine, the Fuller doesn’t draw attention to itself, won’t thwack birds out of the sky, and requires minimal maintenance. Based on a 1913 Nikola Tesla patent, this type of turbine is incredibly efficient, and even a small unit like the prototype shown in the pictures can deliver about 5kW in a 15 knot wind.

This looks like a great solution, but it’s not available yet. Solar Aero is looking to license the design to manufacturers.

 
 
 

New FuturEnergy Turbine Revealed

Better Generation can today exclusively unveil a brand new turbine being launched by the U.K. based FuturEnergy. The image above shows the ‘FuturEnergy Airforce 10 Upwind Turbine,’ the latest product from the midlands-based company.

The makers say that the ‘Airforce 10′ will produce over 10kW of power at wind speeds of just 9 m/s and with carbon-fibre blades, ultrasonic wind sensors, and an on-board uninterruptible power supply for the control electronics, this turbine promises reliability, efficiency, and safety when configured for grid connection or for standalone battery charging.  Early information obtained by Better Generation indicates that the turbine will sport a direct-drive permanent magnet generator, constant self-diagnosis of control circuitry and an SD card data logger for those who want detailed analysis of the Airforce 10′s power output.

FuturEnergy are based near Stratford-upon-Avon in Warwickshire and design, build and market small wind turbine systems for micro-generation of electricity. The ‘Airforce 10′ has 5 times the rotor diameter of their previous effort, the FuturEnergy 1kW, and marks a move away from a rugged DIY look towards the new, sleek set-up shown here. But before you all rush out and buy one, it is of course important you assess the suitability of your site with the Power Predictor.  FuturEnergy’s Managing Director, Peter Osbourne, agrees too that generating electricity from wind is really location specific and says, “If you don’t have enough wind in your sails then installing a wind turbine is a waste of everybody’s time.”

There are no details yet on the cost of this machine, or when the Airforce 10 will be available to consumers but we understand they will be taking orders soon. You can get ahead of the (power) curve by taking a look at our review containing preliminary power output information and some more good-looking pictures.

 
 
 

Homespun power: Energy solution blows in wind with turbine

 
 
 

Innovators Develop Second Wave of Ocean-Based Energy

Published: Friday, 16 Apr 2010 | 4:47 PM ET
 By Trevor Curwin, Special to CNBC.com

Like a deep-sea fisherman of the past, UK-based  Aquamarine Power believes it has conquered the cruel environment of the world’s oceans to bring almost limitless clean energy ashore.

AquaMarine's Oyster technology.
Source: Aquamarine Power
AquaMarine’s Oyster technology.

“Two concepts make it stand out—designed simplicity, and inherent survivability,” says Aquamarine CEO Martin McAdam about the Oyster, its new wave-powered generating technology.

In a tough operating environment that has crushed or drowned many competitors, the Oyster is currently generating energy off the Orkney Islands in northern Scotland by taking the radical approach of leaving the electricity-producing components of its power plant on land.

“This is one of the main challenges facing all ocean energy technologies—how to ensure devices will survive,” he says.

The Oyster’s core is a buoyant, hinged flap that sways backwards and forwards in the waves near shore. This motion drives two hydraulic pistons which push high pressure water onshore to drive a conventional hydroelectric turbine.

That keeps the production end of the equipment—the generator, converters, transformers and circuit breakers – high and dry onshore for easy maintenance and operation.

 

“In essence, the Oyster is simply a large pump which provides the power for a conventional hydroelectric plant,” says McAdam. “There are only seven moving parts offshore—a hinge, two hydraulic pumps that pump the high pressure water to the shoreline and four valves.”

Despite McAdam’s cutting edge technology, the promise of harvesting ocean energy from waves, tides and currents is not new.

For several decades, many test projects have been tried but few achieved scalability, with most concepts succumbing to the operating environment and to high costs of production.

Peter Asmus, an analyst with cleantech research firm Pike Research, says the industry is only now getting starting to build a new generation of technologies, like the Oyster,

“[One] reason why the ocean has not yet been industrialized on behalf of energy production is that the technologies, materials and construction techniques did not exist until now to harness this renewable energy resource in any meaningful and cost effective way,” he says.

The resource is clearly abundant. The Electric Power Research Institute, an independent energy research organization, estimates that the U.S. could produce 10 gigawatts of wave power and 3 gigawatts of tidal power within 10 years.

That would be enough to produce six percent of U.S. electrical demand—similar to the amount provided by hydroelectricity today. Tidal power could replace another three percent of that demand.

 

Europe Leads Race

Currently, most ocean energy development takes place in Europe, spurred by cap-and-trade policies that make renewable energy price-competitive and by governments racing to subsidize the nascent sector.

“While wave and tidal developers are offered lavish subsidies amounting to about 30 cents per kilowatt hour in Europe, the U.S. currently offers a measly one cent per kilowatt hour on top of wholesale rates,” says Pike’s Asmus, pointing out that it is about half of the subsidy offered to onshore wind power projects, “a fully commercialized technology,” he says.

McAdam is happy to take advantage. He calculates the Oyster could generate in excess of 50 gigawatts of power worldwide, “giving us an estimated accessible global market of $190 billion for our technology alone.”

But even if the technology proves itself, large-scale ocean energy projects face the same hurdles that such projects face on land—a spotty transmission grid and a financing crunch still thwarting many big infrastructure projects.

One savior may be a competing renewable energy technology: offshore wind power

Offshore wind projects mount proven and scalable wind turbine technology on platforms at sea. These could work in conjunction with ocean energy systems like Aquamarine’s Oyster, providing crucial infrastructure to make wave and tidal power more viable.

“It could be offshore wind projects finance the transmission lines and [ocean energy] piggybacks on that,” says Asmus.

The mix of the two renewable power sources makes them more reliable to electricity consumers, says Aquamarine’s McAdam.

 Advantages To Rivals

“One of the advantages of wave energy is that it is complementary to wind,” he says. “Waves are created by weather systems far out at sea, and very often when the wind drops, waves increase.”

He says waves are more predictable than wind, adding that “the more sources of green energy you have in the energy mix, the less intermittent it becomes.”

Michael Kanellos, researcher and editor-in-chief with research firm Greentech Media/GTM Research, says that even with those benefits it will still be tough to attract investment for ocean power.

“You’re trying to build something in the world’s worst environment,” he says. “If you’re going to build offshore, you could build offshore wind [more easily]. It’s going to be tough going up against offshore wind.”

He adds this will likely be a niche technology for years to come, with projects deployed in very specific locales to generate power to sell into the wider power grid, or to provide local energy for more remote communities less connected to the grid.

“Some of the best tides in the world are unfortunately on the most unpopulated coastlines,” Kanellos says.

While he’s all for synergy between offshore wind and wave power, McAdam isn’t asking for any favors.

“Our goal is to produce wave energy that is cost-competitive with offshore wind,” he says. “We are a few years off that yet, but we estimate that by 2017, our technology costs will have reduced sufficiently to meet that goal.”

And it may have been a long time coming, but says the opportunity is much closer today than it has been.

“It is expected that within the next five to eight years, these emerging technologies will become commercialized to the point that they can begin competing for a share of the burgeoning market for carbon-free and non-polluting renewable resources,” he says. “We need wind, we need solar, but we should also be smart and be in a good position to tap the immense power of our oceans.”

 © 2010 CNBC.com
 
 
 

DISCLAIMER: The products presented here have been researched and evaluated by Residential Energy Kit to the best of our ability. We make the strongest effort to find satisfying products. The vendors and products performance are researched and evaluated before they are recommended. We receive commissions for product you buy from this page.

» archives

» Sponsored Ads

» recent comments