Posts Tagged ‘Wind Turbine’
About wind turbines: Where do I mount one?
By Networx.comFri, Sep 17 2010 at 11:27 AM ES
Efficiency, safety and neighbors are key issues for wind power siting.

NOT RECOMMENDED: A roof-mounted residential turbine. (Photo: tswind/Flickr)
So you studied the maps and collected local wind data. You know wind power is cost-effective in your area. Now it’s time to site the turbine. Here is how to maximize efficiency and safety while being a good neighbor.
post a comment | filed under Wind Turbine | tags: wind turbin mounting, Wind Turbine, wind turbine installation
» posted on Friday, July 16th, 2010 at 8:22 am by Woody Wilson viewed 29 times
Rules for Wind Power
A request by a tree farmer to install a 120-foot-tall wind turbine on his Long Lane, East Hampton, property has demonstrated that the Town of East Hampton is in need of guidelines for where and how such things are placed. Stephen Mahoney is seeking state and town permits to have the electricity-generating turbine installed on his 20-acre parcel. But the plan has drawn opposition from neighbors and others who want to preserve their views or are concerned about health and safety risks.
The specific location of Mr. Mahoney’s proposed wind turbine has been criticized because it is among many acres that were preserved with taxpayer money and that have been officially designated as scenic. At 120 feet tall, the turbine would tower over all that it is near. Mr. Mahoney should be allowed his turbine, but he should be asked to compromise on a height more acceptable to those who enjoy the view as it is.
The town, however, has no specific regulations governing such projects, though there have been calls for them over the years. This leaves the town board in the unusual position of becoming involved in a land-use decision, something otherwise reserved for other, less political boards, such as planning and zoning. Rules for wind power should be adopted before any additional projects are reviewed.
one Comment | filed under Government Energy Laws · Wind Turbine | tags: Wind Turbine, wind turbine installation laws
» posted on Sunday, May 23rd, 2010 at 5:44 pm by Woody Wilson viewed 241 times
Fully enclosed wind turbine should quiet the NIMBY crowd
![]()
Wind power has long been a favorite of the tree hugging environmentalists, but as with most great ideas, you’ll also find a NIMBY (not in my back yard) crowd complaining about everything from bird strikes to the swishing noise created by the rotating blades. Personally, I think wind farms are really cool, and they show that we’re actually doing something about energy besides chanting drill baby drill.
The Fuller Wind Turbine from Solar Aero Research addresses most of the anti-wind crowd’s concerns. With a fully enclosed turbine, the Fuller doesn’t draw attention to itself, won’t thwack birds out of the sky, and requires minimal maintenance. Based on a 1913 Nikola Tesla patent, this type of turbine is incredibly efficient, and even a small unit like the prototype shown in the pictures can deliver about 5kW in a 15 knot wind.
This looks like a great solution, but it’s not available yet. Solar Aero is looking to license the design to manufacturers.

post a comment | filed under Wind Turbine | tags: Wind Turbine, y enclosed wind turbine
» posted on Friday, April 30th, 2010 at 4:48 pm by Woody Wilson viewed 167 times
New FuturEnergy Turbine Revealed

Better Generation can today exclusively unveil a brand new turbine being launched by the U.K. based FuturEnergy. The image above shows the ‘FuturEnergy Airforce 10 Upwind Turbine,’ the latest product from the midlands-based company.
The makers say that the ‘Airforce 10′ will produce over 10kW of power at wind speeds of just 9 m/s and with carbon-fibre blades, ultrasonic wind sensors, and an on-board uninterruptible power supply for the control electronics, this turbine promises reliability, efficiency, and safety when configured for grid connection or for standalone battery charging. Early information obtained by Better Generation indicates that the turbine will sport a direct-drive permanent magnet generator, constant self-diagnosis of control circuitry and an SD card data logger for those who want detailed analysis of the Airforce 10′s power output.

FuturEnergy are based near Stratford-upon-Avon in Warwickshire and design, build and market small wind turbine systems for micro-generation of electricity. The ‘Airforce 10′ has 5 times the rotor diameter of their previous effort, the FuturEnergy 1kW, and marks a move away from a rugged DIY look towards the new, sleek set-up shown here. But before you all rush out and buy one, it is of course important you assess the suitability of your site with the Power Predictor. FuturEnergy’s Managing Director, Peter Osbourne, agrees too that generating electricity from wind is really location specific and says, “If you don’t have enough wind in your sails then installing a wind turbine is a waste of everybody’s time.”
There are no details yet on the cost of this machine, or when the Airforce 10 will be available to consumers but we understand they will be taking orders soon. You can get ahead of the (power) curve by taking a look at our review containing preliminary power output information and some more good-looking pictures.
post a comment | filed under Energy News · Free Energy · Wind Turbine | tags: Airforce, Better Generation, Electricity Grid, Exclusive, FuturEnergy, Microgeneration, Power curves, Power Predictor, Renewable Energy, Renewable Technology, UK, Wind Power, Wind Turbine
Homespun power: Energy solution blows in wind with turbine
AKRON, Ohio — Last June, Frank Towns put up a wind turbine behind his home to generate electricity.
Turns out it’s generating interest, too. People driving by often stop to ask about it, and Towns is happy to share information about his backyard curiosity.
Towns installed the horizontal-axis wind turbine on his five acres in Stark County’s Nimishillen Township to supply part of his electricity needs. Before, he was paying about $170 a month for electricity, he said; now he pays $70 to $80.
The turbine – an updated version of a windmill in which the mechanical energy is converted to electricity instead of being used to drive machinery – sits atop a 40-foot tower behind Towns’ ranch-style house. A tail fin keeps it facing the wind.
On a recent blustery day, its three 10-foot-long blades spun in a blur, producing a soft whistling sound much like wind blowing through bare trees.
The blades turn a shaft that’s connected to a generator, which produces electrical energy. Underground wires carry that electricity in the form of three-phase alternating current to equipment in Towns’ basement, where it’s converted first to high-voltage direct current and then to the single-phase AC power that can be used in Towns’ home.
When the turbine produces more power than Towns and his wife, Pam, can use, it can be sent out to American Electric Power’s grid for other customers to use or diverted into what’s called a dump load and used for heat. If winds get too high, the turbine shuts off automatically.
Towns’ wind generator is something of an anomaly in Ohio. Green Energy Ohio, an organization that promotes sustainable energy policies and practices, estimates only 100 to 200 residential wind turbines are in use in the state.
They’re uncommon for a number of reasons, including their cost and their need for open spaces, said Stefanie Spear, whose Chagrin Falls, Ohio, company, Expedite Renewable Energy, installs solar- and wind-energy systems. Buildings, trees and other obstructions can interfere with air flow, she explained, making wind turbines unsuitable for most urban sites or small suburban lots.
Nevertheless, federal, state and utility-company incentives are making wind turbines more attractive for those who can install them. Towns said those incentives paid about $24,000 of the $28,000 cost of his 5-kilowatt system.
Towns said his incentive for installing a wind turbine was largely curiosity. “I was always interested in (windmills), even as a kid,” he said. When he saw three turbines in a field in the Findlay, Ohio, area, “I thought, they’ve got to make these for residential use.”
He erected an anemometer, connected it to a computer and spent about three years tracking the wind speed in his yard before determining that a wind turbine would make sense.
Towns bought the turbine from Four Seasons Windpower in Medina County’s Granger Township. He kept his cost lower than average by doing all the installation, except for the electrical work, with the help of a friend.
The American Wind Energy Association says a small wind energy system, installed, costs $3,000 to $6,000 per kilowatt of generating capacity.
Doug Bloom of Four Seasons Windpower, however, said a typical, 10-kilowatt residential system would cost about $105,000 if installed by his company. After incentives, the homeowner’s cost would be $30,000 to $40,000, he said.
That’s a hefty investment, but one that insulates the owner from increases in electricity rates, Bloom noted. “Energy independence is what you’re paying for,” he said.
Still, even proponents say wind energy isn’t for everyone.
Besides available space, a number of factors go into determining whether a wind system makes sense for home use.
One of those factors is wind speed. The American Wind Energy Association generally recommends a site should have an average wind speed of at least 10 mph.
Although much of northern Ohio has favorable wind conditions, Spear said it’s still necessary to study the conditions at any particular site. Speeds can vary greatly from place to place, she said.
In addition, the Wind Energy Association says that for wind power to make financial sense, the homeowner should be paying at least 10 cents per kilowatt hour for electricity.
Ohio Edison’s electricity rate is about 11.5 cents per kilowatt hour for a standard residential customer; American Electric Power’s is 9.75 cents for its Ohio residential customers.
Zoning restrictions can also be a hurdle, although Spear said many local governments are adopting or discussing wind-turbine guidelines. Laws commonly require a “fall zone” – clear distance to buildings or property lines – that’s at least 10 percent greater than the tower’s height.
Bloom, however, insisted the danger of a turbine toppling is practically nonexistent.
He said his company builds a foundation strong enough that if the soil around the base of the tower were removed, the concrete would still keep the tower upright. Besides, “how many street lights and signs fall on vehicles?” he asked rhetorically. “I don’t see any problem.”
Manufacturers are addressing space limitations by developing turbines that spin around a vertical axis and produce less vibration than a horizontal-axis turbine, so they can be mounted atop buildings instead of towers. They’re typically smaller than horizontal-axis wind generators and more suitable to urban and residential areas, Spear said, but they don’t produce as much power.
Even with a vertical-axis wind turbine, however, it’s important to make sure the structure on which it’s mounted can stand up to the vibration, she said. She’s looking into one for a project she’s working on in Bay Village, she said, but she still needs to learn more.
Other issues include the possibility that horizontal-axis turbines can throw ice off their blades when it starts to melt, Spear said.
Concerns have also been raised about turbine blades striking birds and bats, but that doesn’t appear to be a major problem with residential-size turbines, said Keith Lott, a wind energy wildlife biologist with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources’ Division of Wildlife. Their blades are smaller and rotate faster than those on commercial turbines, making them easier for wildlife to detect and avoid, he said.
He recommended homeowners choose a self-supporting, single-pole tower for a wind turbine. Such a tower doesn’t have places for birds to roost or guy wires that birds can fly into, he explained.
Some people object to wind turbines for aesthetic reasons, Spear said. Towns said he got signatures of approval from all his neighbors before he installed his turbine.
So far, Towns said, he’s had no problems with his system. The wind turbine’s bearings will need to be checked about every five years, he said, but he doesn’t anticipate other maintenance requirements. He expects the turbine to last 20 years.
Long before that, he said, he expects his energy savings will have paid off his investment.
WIND-POWER RESOURCES
Want to know more about wind turbines? Here are some resources:
-The U. S. Department of Energy’s Wind Powering America program, http://www.windpoweringamerica.gov. The site includes the publication “Small Wind Electric Systems: An Ohio Consumer’s Guide.”
-The American Wind Energy Association, http://www.awea.org/smallwind or 202-383-2500.
-Green Energy Ohio, http://www.greenenergyohio.org. The phone number for its Northeast Ohio office is 216-526-5545.
If you’re considering installing a wind turbine, installer Stefanie Spear recommended first making your home as energy-efficient as possible. Then have a feasibility study done to assess your electrical use, the amount of wind the site experiences and the expected rate of return on your investment.
She recommended hiring a consultant or installer to help you through the process, including identifying financial incentives that are available.
post a comment | filed under Energy News · Free Energy · Home Improvement · Wind Turbine | tags: horizontal wind turbine, Wind Turbine
Innovators Develop Second Wave of Ocean-Based Energy
Like a deep-sea fisherman of the past, UK-based Aquamarine Power believes it has conquered the cruel environment of the world’s oceans to bring almost limitless clean energy ashore.
![]() |
|
Source: Aquamarine Power
AquaMarine’s Oyster technology.
|
“Two concepts make it stand out—designed simplicity, and inherent survivability,” says Aquamarine CEO Martin McAdam about the Oyster, its new wave-powered generating technology.
In a tough operating environment that has crushed or drowned many competitors, the Oyster is currently generating energy off the Orkney Islands in northern Scotland by taking the radical approach of leaving the electricity-producing components of its power plant on land.
“This is one of the main challenges facing all ocean energy technologies—how to ensure devices will survive,” he says.
The Oyster’s core is a buoyant, hinged flap that sways backwards and forwards in the waves near shore. This motion drives two hydraulic pistons which push high pressure water onshore to drive a conventional hydroelectric turbine.
That keeps the production end of the equipment—the generator, converters, transformers and circuit breakers – high and dry onshore for easy maintenance and operation.
LinksList Documentid: 36413751
- Editor’s Introduction: Green Technology Rules
- Earth Day Turns 40: How Tech Made Us Greener
- New Technology To Drive Hydro Power Comes On Stream
- Innovators Develop Second Wave of Ocean-Based Energy
- Big Market But Big Challenge For Small-Wind Turbine Makers
- Algae Could Grow Into A Biofuels Leader
- Fuel-Cell Power Industry Takes On Important New Market
- Slideshow: Top New Green Tech Companies
- Venture-Capital Deals in Clean Tech Hit Record In First Quarter
“In essence, the Oyster is simply a large pump which provides the power for a conventional hydroelectric plant,” says McAdam. “There are only seven moving parts offshore—a hinge, two hydraulic pumps that pump the high pressure water to the shoreline and four valves.”
Despite McAdam’s cutting edge technology, the promise of harvesting ocean energy from waves, tides and currents is not new.
For several decades, many test projects have been tried but few achieved scalability, with most concepts succumbing to the operating environment and to high costs of production.
Peter Asmus, an analyst with cleantech research firm Pike Research, says the industry is only now getting starting to build a new generation of technologies, like the Oyster,
“[One] reason why the ocean has not yet been industrialized on behalf of energy production is that the technologies, materials and construction techniques did not exist until now to harness this renewable energy resource in any meaningful and cost effective way,” he says.
The resource is clearly abundant. The Electric Power Research Institute, an independent energy research organization, estimates that the U.S. could produce 10 gigawatts of wave power and 3 gigawatts of tidal power within 10 years.
That would be enough to produce six percent of U.S. electrical demand—similar to the amount provided by hydroelectricity today. Tidal power could replace another three percent of that demand.
Europe Leads Race
Currently, most ocean energy development takes place in Europe, spurred by cap-and-trade policies that make renewable energy price-competitive and by governments racing to subsidize the nascent sector.
“While wave and tidal developers are offered lavish subsidies amounting to about 30 cents per kilowatt hour in Europe, the U.S. currently offers a measly one cent per kilowatt hour on top of wholesale rates,” says Pike’s Asmus, pointing out that it is about half of the subsidy offered to onshore wind power projects, “a fully commercialized technology,” he says.
McAdam is happy to take advantage. He calculates the Oyster could generate in excess of 50 gigawatts of power worldwide, “giving us an estimated accessible global market of $190 billion for our technology alone.”
But even if the technology proves itself, large-scale ocean energy projects face the same hurdles that such projects face on land—a spotty transmission grid and a financing crunch still thwarting many big infrastructure projects.
One savior may be a competing renewable energy technology: offshore wind power
Offshore wind projects mount proven and scalable wind turbine technology on platforms at sea. These could work in conjunction with ocean energy systems like Aquamarine’s Oyster, providing crucial infrastructure to make wave and tidal power more viable.
“It could be offshore wind projects finance the transmission lines and [ocean energy] piggybacks on that,” says Asmus.
The mix of the two renewable power sources makes them more reliable to electricity consumers, says Aquamarine’s McAdam.
Advantages To Rivals
“One of the advantages of wave energy is that it is complementary to wind,” he says. “Waves are created by weather systems far out at sea, and very often when the wind drops, waves increase.”
He says waves are more predictable than wind, adding that “the more sources of green energy you have in the energy mix, the less intermittent it becomes.”
Michael Kanellos, researcher and editor-in-chief with research firm Greentech Media/GTM Research, says that even with those benefits it will still be tough to attract investment for ocean power.
“You’re trying to build something in the world’s worst environment,” he says. “If you’re going to build offshore, you could build offshore wind [more easily]. It’s going to be tough going up against offshore wind.”
He adds this will likely be a niche technology for years to come, with projects deployed in very specific locales to generate power to sell into the wider power grid, or to provide local energy for more remote communities less connected to the grid.
“Some of the best tides in the world are unfortunately on the most unpopulated coastlines,” Kanellos says.
While he’s all for synergy between offshore wind and wave power, McAdam isn’t asking for any favors.
“Our goal is to produce wave energy that is cost-competitive with offshore wind,” he says. “We are a few years off that yet, but we estimate that by 2017, our technology costs will have reduced sufficiently to meet that goal.”
And it may have been a long time coming, but says the opportunity is much closer today than it has been.
“It is expected that within the next five to eight years, these emerging technologies will become commercialized to the point that they can begin competing for a share of the burgeoning market for carbon-free and non-polluting renewable resources,” he says. “We need wind, we need solar, but we should also be smart and be in a good position to tap the immense power of our oceans.”
post a comment | filed under Energy News · Government Energy Laws · Wave & Tide Energy · Wind Turbine | tags: cap-in-trade, wave energy, Wind Turbine















